Online Petition
Online Petition > Human Rights
Share it!
Tell A friend OR
Inform Your Friends by: Importing Your Address Book from Email Or Community Site.
Anti-Woman Social Groups
To/Against/For: Anti-Womancan anyone help me?!
as the (non-violent yet possibly schizophrenic) brain-damaged woman-hater behind the political campaign of www.legalizerape.org, i am asking if there is a group for my kind that's NOT in a mental hospital. you see, being an advocate for the legalization of rape is not criminal - it's islamic, at best - and it's not worthy of a mental hospital. mental hospitals are for crazy people...bates motel psychos. mental hospitals have done absolutely nothing for me, from massachusets to nashville to pennsylvania. absolutely nothing, that's because i didn't belong there.
i'm looking to find a group of other woman-haters in the area, where we can fantasize together in the privacy of...a group-therapy room. just a bunch of men, jerking each other off while gawking at pictures and videos of terrified women being raped. no gays would be allowed, no masculivoids, no one to be aroused by men - the arousal must only be the rape of the woman and the eventual silence of the lambs.
i must confess that when i'm alone in my room, i sometimes fantasize about punching a wombn or raping a wombn or even using a machete to cure a woman of breast cancer. dare i mention hannibal lecter or any of my other fantasies involving the womb. i just have so many violent thoughts running through my head at times, i laugh when they come around - i just want to do so much harm to the notion of "anything a man can do". i just want to drive around with a "rape your woman" bumper sticker on the back of my car, even "murder your single mother". i want to wear a shirt that states "i am a rapist". i want to see if milk will spurt out if i cut a castration-advocating feminst's breasts off, being that all breasts are there to provide milk for the newborn. all breasts were made to nurture the young, even feminists' breasts. these boobs are made to nurture. i also wonder if white breastmilk and red menstrual blood are just normal in a body designed for motherhood, or are they the reason that PINK is the woman's color?
i advocate for soldiers who aren't pipsqueaks to rape any female soldier who maintains that she can do anything a man can do when she's fully aware of the "affirmative action" programs, the gender-based military requirements given to female soldiers (like little jessica lynch) so that they can feel competent. maybe if the physical requirements weren't compromised, little jessica lynch would have never become a soldier and therefore wouldn't have been captured by the enemy and turned into the classic "damsel in distress" needing to be rescued.
maybe if military requirements weren't compromised just for little ones to say "yes i can" like the baby pulling up her own diaper, kirsten fike wouldn't have died from heat-exhaustion on the arizona border. that little southern satire must've been a godsend. :) oh, how i laughed. and laughed and laughed. i was so proud, in fact, that i registered a domain name called "kirstenfike.com" that pointed to my online satirization of women - strongwomen.info.
about my quest for a group: it all started when i'd finally realize the reason why any random female is referred to as a "woman," while calling any random male a "man" is replaced by "guy". it's because calling someone a "man" seems to be reserved for men who have done something noble that's worthy of respect, while anyone with a set of milk jugs and a bloody womb is worthy enough to be called a "woman". or, fittingly, a "wombn".
"he's not a MAN," said the ex-wife about her former husband...as if to suggest that being a legitimate man is something that a male who she doesn't respect cannot achieve. has anyone ever heard anyone say "she's not a WOMAN," in an effort to belittle a female? of course not, and that's because "man" is more noble a word than the overused "woman" is.
well, every cocoa-american male seems to be awarded the title of "man," but that hints back to the unwarranted respect given to any female being labeled a "woman" just because of her gender. the "black man" is worthy of the "man" title just because of his race. much like "affirmative action," females are "women" regardless, while males must earn the title of "man". does that suggest that females are partly disabled and that special consideration is given to them because of their disability? is "affirmative action" actually racist to perceive cocoa-americans as similarly disabled and unable to achieve as well as whites? and how does this perceived lack of ability relate to sports teams based on gender or a chain of fitness centers for females only? what about making a special "ladies' division" of the coney island hot dog eating competition, what about the acceptance of the sexism permeating from the mere notion of "ladies only" poker tounaments? is this perceived lack of ability a kind of sexism that is tolerated?
and what about gays? the "gay man" is never disregarded with a slight-of-hand and the words "gay guy," be it on talk shows or in movies or in any form of media...it's always "gay man" and a respectful kowtow. yes, calling someone a "man" instead of the less-important "guy" has become an expression of respect...something your everyday white man doesn't receive when he's often taken for just "the white guy". why isn't the straight, white man worthy of any affirmative action - and is this lack of acknowledgement towards "joe six-pack" reminiscent of the lack of respect given to america? have both america and "the man" just been superior for too long, are the lesser ones starting to get as jealous as an infant crying "that's not faaaaaiiiiiiirrrrrr" and stomping away? is this jealousy of superiority also extending to non-christian religions?
it's commonly called being "politically correct," all of this kowtowing to the less-than-excellent aspects of society. gold stars for everyone (even women), a plaque on the wall for everyone (even blacks), a place in heaven for everyone (even for unrepentant sinners full of Pride).
here is the truth: the female's body is designed for motherhood, the woman is a nurturer by nature, not a warrior. it is not a woman's place to be trying to prove herself stronger than a fifth grader, a girl becomes a woman with widening hips while a boy becomes a man with widening shoulders. these widening body-parts relate to the role of the genders and what they are designed for, either childbirth or physical strength. men and women should live according to the gender responsible for the aforementioned body parts.
here is the truth: it was wrong for blacks to have been separated from their families in africa, they should never have been used as free labor for convenience. though i do find fault with overcompensation, i can understand why "affirmative action" exists and i know that implementing such compensations for the "children of a lesser mind" is probably much easier than sending all of those "lesser minds" back to africa where there'd be no whites to make them feel lesser.
here is the truth: gays can go against god's (and biology's) plan for humanity, but they shouldn't expect not to be slapped in the face after they die if they were slapping god's (and biology's) plan in the face every day they were living. gays shouldn't get any "affirmative action" in the form of a pastor's lie that says unrepentant sinners who lived a life full of pride and lust are just as qualified to spend eternity in heaven as the repentant sinners are.
here is the god's-honest truth: WE, AS A NATION, MUST STOP COMPENSATING FOR THE HANDICAPPED IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE THEM FEEL EITHER MANLY OR WHITE OR HETEROSEXUAL.
dylan terreri, i
www.legalizerape.org
Recent Comments
| Name | Comment | |
| There are no comment/signature. |
Sign the above petition